|
Lance Hester |
||||||||||||||||||||
Pierce County District CourtPosition Two
Legal/Judicial Experience: Washington State Supreme Court and the Washington Court of Appeals (all divisions); Superior, District, and municipal civil and criminal trials or appearances in at least a dozen counties; Federal - Washington, Pennsylvania, Idaho and 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Other Professional Experience: Bar Association Treasurer, Trustee, and Young Lawyer representative; WSBA Young Lawyer President Education: JD Seattle University; BA Pepperdine Community Service: Muscular Dystrophy organizations volunteer; Gig Harbor Young Life - committee chair (2000-2009) and fundraiser; Outdoors For All disabled ski coach volunteer (2009); Upward Basketball coach/PAA Baseball coach; Chapel Hill Church member; Backup Buddies founding member; Pierce County Sheriff's Boating Advisory Commission (term expired) Statement: I want to help keep your family safe. I want you to be comfortable when you need to access the court. I believe restraining orders should be easy to obtain and repeat offenders should be dealt with aggressively. I will require offenders to participate in available rehabilitation programs. My courtroom will be there for you when needed. My goal will be to provide justice without delay. My background is the most comprehensive among the candidates. I stand up for victims daily. I have litigated in federal courts and state courts at all levels. Pierce County deserves a new judge with this kind of experience. The District Court is the best place for a judge who wants to help improve families, the community, and access to the courts. That is the type of judge I will be. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Official web site: electlancehester.com | Facebook | |||||||||||||||||||||
Opponents: Kevin McCann, Claire Sussman,
Karl Williams |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Candidate ratings:
Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings for candidates with an asterisk (*), and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate. Again, please check the organizations' pages for further details. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Finance report: (Click a dollar figure for detailed information.)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Media stories:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA
98383 As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors. |