General Election: November 4, 2014


An information resource for Washington voters


 

Home

Show My Elections

Supreme Court

Court of Appeals

Election Archives

 

Fred Bonner

 

Seattle Municipal Court

Position Seven

Fred BonnerEducation: No information submitted

Occupation: No information submitted

Statement: I was elected as a Judge to the Seattle Municipal Court in 1989. Thank you for the honor of being able to serve the City and the people I love for the last 25 years.

My entire career, I have been active and engaged in my community—initiating life skills programs at local high schools, serving on several boards including Big Brothers of King County, teaching law at Seattle University and North Seattle College, serving as a counseling resource for immigrant communities in South Seattle, and leading free trial advocacy seminars to help people better understand and interact with the law.

As a judge, I built the first Community Court in Washington State. Rather than go to jail, non-violent misdemeanor offenders are assigned to community service and connected to social services to address the root causes of their criminal behavior.

A veteran myself, I have always been concerned with the number of veterans who come before the court with serious mental health problems, driven in many cases by PTSD. I helped create a Veterans’ Court where veterans have the opportunity to address criminal issues while also receiving help they need to survive. I believe that veterans have been there for our country and our courts needs to be there for them.

I also created a Day-Reporting Program to address issues of court appearance compliance. Many homeless defendants were being held in jail, because they missed prior court dates. Day-Reporting uses existing city staff for daily check-ins to be reminded of their upcoming court dates without confinement. This program saved over $2,000,000 in jail costs, while making jail beds available for dangerous criminals.

Community Court, Veteran’s Court and Day-Reporting have proven to be more effective than traditional criminal justice processes in reducing recidivism, while still addressing the real human problems of those who appear before me.

As a judge I have been tough but fair, and have a proven record of results. I bring a wealth of experience to the bench, lead with my integrity, and put in the hard work of implementing programs that reflect the values of our city. I will continue instituting reforms that more effectively reduce crime, save money and, more importantly, lives.

I would be honored to have your vote.


 
Official web site: http://www.judgebonner.com  
Opponent: Damon Shadid
 
Candidate ratings:

ORGANIZATION FRED
BONNER
DAMON
SHADID
Cardozo Society * Exceptionally
Well Qualified
King County Bar Association Refused to
Cooperate
Exceptionally
Well Qualified
Joint Asian Judicial
Evaluations Committee
* Well Qualified
Latina/o Bar Association
of Washington
* Exceptionally
Well Qualified
Loren Miller Bar Association * Exceptionally
Well Qualified
QLaw: The GLBT Bar
Association of Washington
* Well Qualified
Washington Women Lawyers * Exceptionally
Well Qualified

Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings for candidates with an asterisk (*), and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate.


 

Newspaper endorsements (click paper for details):

NEWSPAPER FRED
BONNER
DAMON
SHADID
Seattle Gay News  
Seattle Times  
The Stranger  

 
   
 

VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA  98383
Write to [email protected].

As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors.