|
Janet Garrow |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
King County District CourtNortheast Division, Position OneEducation: JD, University of Puget Sound (Seattle University); MS, Counseling, Purdue University; BA, Psychology, Marquette University Occupation: District Court Judge; former Prosecuter, Public Defender and Civil Litigator Statement: Judge Garrow has served as your District Court Judge for 16 years (thank you!) at all Eastside courthouses. She is passionate about equal justice. She works hard to ensure everyone is heard, all are treated fairly and respectfully, and legal rights are protected. Please support her reelection. Over 140 judges, including Supreme Court Justices, endorse her reelection. Judge Garrow received the highest rating, "Exceptionally Well Qualified", from the King County Bar. She's a leader in the legal community, elected to the state Board for Judicial Administration and several times as Eastside Presiding Judge. Before becoming a Judge, Janet had a 17-year career in public and private practice. She was a partner with Cairncross & Hempelmann. Janet grew up in a large family on a farm and paid her way through school. She's been a Bellevue resident for 24 years and has a teenage daughter. Janet's volunteered for many local human services agencies. Broadly Supported: Sheriff John Urquhart; King County Police Officers' Guild; Bellevue Mayor Claudia Balducci, Councilmember Conrad Lee; Representatives Judy Clibborn, Cyrus Habib, Roger Goodman; County Councilmembers Kathy Lambert, Jane Hague; former US Attorneys John and Mike McKay; National Women's Political Caucus; King County Labor Council; King County Democrats. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official web site: www.reelectjudgejanetgarrow.com | Facebook | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opponent: Dawn Bettinger |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Candidate ratings:
Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings for candidates with an asterisk (*), and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Newspaper endorsements (click paper for details):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA
98383 As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors. |