July 15, 2012 — Washington state Supreme Court
Justice Steven Gonzalez
offers experience as a King County Superior Court judge,
as a federal prosecutor who helped win a conviction in a
high-profile international terrorism case, and as a
justice who has served one judicial term as the court’s
newest member. Gov. Chris Gregoire late last year
appointed Gonzalez to fill the position that opened when
Justice Gerry Alexander reached the mandatory retirement
age of 75.
Gonzalez’s opponent, Kitsap County attorney
Bruce Danielson, has
practiced law for 28 years and worked in criminal law,
civil litigation and bankruptcy. But he brings no
experience as a judge or prosecutor; he ran
unsuccessfully for Kitsap County Superior Court judge in
2004 and 2008 and for county prosecutor in 2010.
Based on experience and qualifications, this is an easy
call: The Yakima Herald-Republic editorial board
endorses Steven Gonzalez for a full six-year term on the
state Supreme Court.
Gonzalez brings far more than a strong résumé to the
state’s highest court. In meeting with the editorial
board, Gonzalez displayed the judicial knowledge and
temperament that as an assistant U.S. attorney helped
convict "Millennium Bomber" Ahmed Ressam in 2001, and
that as a judge helped him win three elections in his
decade on the King County Superior Court. His skills
have won endorsements from the other eight Supreme Court
justices along with gubernatorial candidates Rob
McKenna, a Republican, and Jay Inslee, a Democrat.
Gonzalez came across as a cautious justice who respects
the state constitution and for judicial precedent; a law
shouldn’t change just because the justices do, he said.
He also has worked extensively at improving the judicial
system to allow everyone a fair trial, He is the former
chairman of the state Access to Justice Board, in which
he worked to improve accessibility for those with
physical disabilities, such as those in wheelchairs or
in need of sign-language services, and interpreters for
those whose first language is not English. He has also
worked with the "plain language" movement to make court
documents more readable for citizens.
Equal access also played a role in Gonzalez’s work as
the former co-chairman of the Race and Criminal Justice
System Task Force. Gonzalez, the second Latino to serve
on the state Supreme Court, said he found increasing
costs have hindered equal treatment for all in the court
system. "Each one of us is a minority when we come
before the court," Gonzalez told the Herald-Republic.
Gonzalez is running a determined campaign, raising more
than $200,000 and meeting statewide with civic groups
and members of the judiciary community.
Danielson has raised no money, has not been seen on the
campaign trail and ignored repeated requests to meet
with the Herald-Republic editorial board. We can only
speculate why he is running at all — perhaps he wants to
fly under the radar into a relatively low-profile
position that will be decided in the Aug. 7 primary
election, where turnout will be lower than in the
November general election.
The voters now have the opportunity to elect a
well-qualified sitting judge to a full term on the
state’s high court. Any Supreme Court candidate who gets
more than 50 percent in the primary automatically wins
election, which in this two-way race means the winner
will be determined Aug. 7. Voters who get their ballots
in the mail this week would do well to mark the box for
Steven Gonzalez.
Return Owens to third term on State Supreme Court
July 15, 2012 — The Aug. 7 primary could
decide the race for Washington state Supreme Court
Justice Position 2, in which incumbent
Susan Owens is seeking
a third term against challengers
Scott Stafne and
Douglas McQuaid, This is a classic case of an
established justice facing insurgent outsiders who are,
in essence, running against the system; Stafne and
McQuaid are longtime practicing attorneys who offer no
experience as judges.
In this case, Owens’ experience and temperament give her
the clear advantage. Based on a joint interview with the
three candidates, the Yakima Herald-Republic editorial
board endorses Susan Owens for a third Supreme Court
term.
Owens brought judicial experience when she was first
elected statewide in 2000, having served as a District
Court judge in Clallam County and as a tribal court
judge. Serving at the local level, she told the board,
"was a very real exercise of court principles in
action," one she said has proved valuable as a Supreme
Court justice.
Owens noted that with the present makeup of the court,
she will be third in seniority come January. She
asserted that her tenure allows her to become an
increasingly influential member of the court. Owens can
effectively claim a range of judicial experience that
brings depth and background to her legal decisions.
Stafne’s résumé includes a variety of cases in his
Snohomish County law practice. He accused the court
system — the Supreme Court especially — of working
poorly, but he didn’t articulate clearly why that is or
how he would improve the court’s function.
McQuaid decried the influence of money in the campaign
but didn’t adequately explain how it compromises the
system — or any rulings by the court in general or Owens
in particulary.
The King County Bar Association rated Owens as well
qualified and Stafne as not qualified. McQuaid refused
to take part in the bar association’s survey. As of
Friday, Owens had raised just shy of $77,000 and spent
just over $41,000 on her re-election bid. Neither of the
challengers has reported raising or spending any money
on their respective campaigns.
Under state law, a Supreme Court candidate who wins more
than 50 percent in the primary wins the election. Susan
Owens is easily the best choice of the three and
deserves re-election.
• Members of the Yakima Herald-Republic editorial
board are Sharon J. Prill, Bob Crider, Frank Purdy and
Karen Troianello.