Archived Version: August 7, 2012


An information resource for Washington voters


 

Home

Show My Elections

Supreme Court

Court of Appeals

Media Stories

Candidates A-Z

Judges A-Z

Voting for Judges: FAQ

Sponsors

Election Archives

Support VotingforJudges

 

Marianne Jones

 

King County Superior Court

Department 42

Marianne JonesLegal/Judicial Experience: 20 years experience representing thousands of legal issues to judges in State and Federal Trial Courts, State and Federal Appellate Courts, and Multiple State Supreme Courts. Pro Tem Judge in King County District Court. Served as King County Superior Court Arbitrator.

Other Professional Experience: Law firm owner representing hundreds of business litigation clients in consumer protection, real estate, land use, insurance bad faith, and constitutional issues. Washington State Bar Association Pro Bono Service Awards.

Education: JD, Seattle University, 1991: BA, University of Washington, 1988.

Community Service: Boys and Girls Club, Children’s Hospital, Hopelink, Lifespring, and multiple school PTSAs; recipient of Washington State PTSA Outstanding Advocate Award.

Statement: In my law practice for the past 20 years, I have fearlessly fought against the unjust actions of corporate giants, insurance companies, quasi-judicial governing bodies, local and state governments. I have fought with conviction against bias, gender, and racial discrimination perpetrated against those victimized. With tenacity and perseverance I have taken on controversial land use issues. I’ve accepted dozens of pro bono cases to help those who could not afford costly attorney’s fees.

Serving the public as a judge pro tem, I immediately felt comfortable on the bench. I listen to people before me, understand their circumstances, respectfully explain my application of the law to their issue, and do so efficiently and patiently. Both lawyers and litigants leave my courtroom knowing they have been treated fairly. My organizational skills, use of technological efficiencies, and implementation of clear expectations will produce an extremely well run courtroom.

I have been married for 23 years to Pacific Northwest Football Hall of Fame coach Pat Jones and enjoy our family.

With your vote, I’d like to continue my oath of upholding the law as written and to work hard to make our courts more accessible and more reflective of the communities we serve.


 
Campaign Web Site: www.jonesforjudge2012.com | Facebook  
Email: [email protected]
 
Opponents: Sue Parisien, David Ruzumna, Chris Washington
 
Questionnaire responses: For Municipal League of King County
 

Candidate ratings:

ORGANIZATION MARIANNE
JONES
SUE
PARISIEN
DAVID
RUZUMNA
CHRIS
WASHINGTON
Cardozo Society * * * Qualified
King County
Bar Association
Not Qualified Qualified Qualified Well Qualified
Municipal League
of King County
Adequate Very Good Good Very Good
Q-Law: The GLBT
Bar Association of Washington
* * * Qualified
Seattle Metropolitan
Elections Committee
* * Recommended Recommended
Washington
Women Lawyers
* * Not Qualified Qualified

Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings from all organizations for all candidates, and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate. Again, please check the organizations' pages for further details.


Newspaper endorsements (click paper for details):

NEWSPAPER MARIANNE
JONES
SUE
PARISIEN
DAVID
RUZUMNA
CHRIS
WASHINGTON
Seattle Times      
The Stranger      

Finance report:

CANDIDATE UPDATED CONTRIBUTIONS EXPENDITURES
Marianne Jones 8/3/2012 $25,039.04 $20,593.09
Sue Parisien 8/3/2012 $0.00 $0.00
David Ruzumna 8/3/2012 $16,039.99 $9,453.96
Chris Washington 8/3/2012 $32,752.00
Loans $10,000.00
$24,716.74

 
 
 

VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA  98383
Write to [email protected].

As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors.