General Election: November 6, 2012


An information resource for Washington voters


 

Home

Show My Elections

Supreme Court

Court of Appeals

Media Stories

Candidates A-Z

Judges A-Z

Voting for Judges: FAQ

Sponsors

Election Archives

Support VotingforJudges

 

Susan Owens

 

Washington Supreme Court

Position 2

Susan Owens

Legal/Judicial Experience: Susan Owens joined the Washington State Supreme court in 2000 after serving nineteen years as District Court Judge in Western Clallam County. She also served as the Quileute Tribe's Chief Judge for five years and Chief Judge of the Lower Elwha S'Klallam Tribe for six years.

Other Professional Experience: Justice Owens serves on the Rules Committee, the Bench-Bar-Press Committee, and the Board for Judicial Administration.

Education: Duke University (1971); University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, (J.D. 1975.)

Community Service: Justice Owens has offered decades of community service to our citizens and the issues she is passionate about. Please see www.JusticeSusanOwens.com for complete biography.

Statement: “I bring proven experience and an important perspective to the Supreme Court. I’m a longtime rural judge, mother and independent voice for common sense rulings that respect our rights, our privacy—and our Constitution.”

A judge for 31 years, Supreme Court Justice Susan Owens has served with integrity, independence and a strong commitment to your Constitutional rights. Prior to being elected to the Supreme Court in 2000, Justice Owens served on the Clallam County District Court for nearly two decades. Known for balanced, common sense rulings, she earned a national reputation teaching judges how to enforce tougher domestic violence laws.

One of the most productive Justices, authoring numerous important opinions on complex cases, Justice Owens has served with honor and the respect of her peers. Her plain interpretations of the law are rooted in common sense, free of bias, and seek to respect your rights and privacy.

Justice Owens has never held partisan office. A seasoned judge when she joined the court, she has earned the respect and endorsements of judges statewide, advocates for women, crime victims, working families and law enforcement. Justice Owens has earned high ratings and deserves your vote. Re-elect Justice Susan Owens.


 
Opponents:
 
Questionnaire responses: For King County Democrats

 
Video Voters' Guide:

 

Candidate ratings:

ORGANIZATION SUSAN
OWENS
Justice for Washington
Foundation
Qualified
King County Bar Association Well Qualified
Q-Law: The GLBT
Bar Association of Washington
Exceptionally
Well Qualified
Seattle Metropolitan
Elections Committee
Highly
Recommended

Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings from all organizations for all candidates, and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate. Again, please check the organizations' pages for further details.


 

Newspaper endorsements (click paper for details):

NEWSPAPER SUSAN
OWENS
The Columbian
Kitsap Sun
Seattle Times
The Stranger
Tri-City Herald
Tacoma News Tribune
Yakima Herald-Republic

 

Finance report:

See individual contributors:
Susan Owens


Media stories:
    July 26, 2012
Seattle Times   Primary to determine one State Supreme Court race
Seattle P-I   Hilyer boosted over Sanders in judicial rating
    July 22, 2012
Seattle P-I   Challengers no-shows at Supreme Court forum

 
 

VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA  98383
Write to [email protected].

As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors.