|
Susan Mahoney |
||||||||||||
King County District CourtSouthwest Division, Position Two
Occupation: Assistant City Attorney, City of Des Moines Education: B.A. University of Washington and J.D. Seattle University School of Law Statement: The King County Bar Association rates Susan Mahoney Exceptionally Well Qualified for the District Court bench -- its HIGHEST rating. Mahoney offers proven courtroom experience having handled thousands of cases in her career as a Judge Pro Tem, King County Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, municipal prosecutor, and attorney in private practice. Her opponent recently received the LOWEST performance rating of all District Court judges in King County and has been sanctioned twice by the Judicial Conduct Commission for treating courtroom participants in a rude and humiliating manner. In contrast, Susan Mahoney has earned a reputation as being tough but fair-minded with solid integrity and focused on reaching a just result -- treating everyone with graciousness, patience and respect in the process. Susan Mahoney is the change we need and deserve. ENDORSED BY: King County Police Officers Guild; Citizens for Judicial Excellence; King County Councilmember Julia Patterson; State Senator Karen Keiser; State Representatives Sharon Nelson and Dave Upthegrove; Des Moines Mayor Sheckler and Councilmembers Scott, Sherman, Musser, and White (former); Milton Mayor Katrina Asay; Federal Way Councilmember Jim Ferrell; Des Moines Police Commander John O'Leary; Milton Police Chief William Rhoads; local judges, prosecutors, attorneys and victim advocates. See complete list at www.mahoneyforjudge.com. |
|||||||||||||
Official web site: www.mahoneyforjudge.com | |||||||||||||
Opponent: Judith Eiler |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Candidate ratings:
Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings for candidates with an asterisk (*), and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate. |
|||||||||||||
Newspaper endorsements (click paper for details):
|
|||||||||||||
Finance report:
|
|||||||||||||
Media stories:
|
|||||||||||||
VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA
98383 As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors. |