|
Robert Kelly |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington Court of AppealsDivision One, District OneThis race will be decided in the primary election.Current Occupation/Employer: Lawyer, Law Offices of Robert D. Kelly & Associates, 1997 - present. Legal/Judicial Experience: Admitted to Washington State Bar Association in 1997. Significant Career Experience: Whitman County Prosecutor's Office, 1995-1997. Education: Bachelor of Arts in English, University of Washington • Master of Science in Information Systems, Hawaii Pacific University. • Juris Doctor, University of Idaho College of Law. Family: Robert and his wife have two children. Candidate Statement: I welcome the opportunity to work hard at the job of judging. If elected, I promise to do my utmost to serve honorably and perform the duties of a judge with due diligence, perseverance, and steadfast devotion to duty. I pray I would make decisions with reason, logic and wisdom to help build a better judicial system and government. I have a profound belief in the validity of the law. The rule of law is perhaps the best invention of the human mind. The resolution of conflicts through judicial proceedings is a fine and noble calling. Judges should uphold the law and implement the law impartially. Judges should be neither activists nor unaware of the need for bringing the quality of humanity to the courtroom. The law should be generally predictable. The law should be equally applicable to everyone. The law should be just, even-handed, and equitable. Justice is an essential feature of any civilized society. We have been experiencing changes recently, including a difficult economy and the progress of technology. Our circumstances require judges who can stand on the solid ground of statutes and precedents while looking forward to a future for all of us Washingtonians and Americans. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official web site: home.comcast.net/~robert_d_kelly/site/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opponent: Anne Ellington |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Candidate ratings:
Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings for candidates with an asterisk (*), and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate. Again, please check the organizations' pages for further details.. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Newspaper endorsements (click paper for details):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance report:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA
98383 As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors. |