General Election: November 3, 2009


An information resource for Washington voters


 

Home

Show My Elections

Supreme Court

Court of Appeals

Ratings and Endorsements

Media Stories

Candidates A-Z

Judges A-Z

Voting for Judges: FAQ

Sponsors

Election Archives

 

VotingforJudges.org » Ratings & Endorsements » Newspaper Endorsements »
 

Federal Way Mirror

Endorsements

 

 

Election 2009 candidate endorsements

FW Municipal Court judge

Saturday, October 17, 2009

• For position 1, The Mirror recommends voting for Rebecca Robertson. Of the challengers who filed to run against incumbent Michael Morgan, Robertson is the most qualified professionally. With ample experience as a prosecutor and pro-tem judge, Robertson will be ready to take the bench from day one. She will help restore an overall image of professionalism at the court and bring back a sense of stability. Despite his talent as a judge, Morgan’s publicly-reprimanded behavior while running the court has given both the institution and the city a black eye. It is unlikely that behavior will change if he stays in office.

• For position 2, The Mirror recommends voting for David Larson. The lifelong Federal Way resident has served the past 18 months as judge after the city appointed him to the job. He is the more qualified candidate who made an earnest attempt to mediate controversy involving the court’s presiding judge. The clincher is Larson’s proposed "court improvement plan" and his effort to defend the municipal court from termination by the city. His opponent, Renee Walls, could make a good judge, but a few more years of experience as a pro-tem judge would give her stronger credentials to run again.


 
 

VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA  98383
Write to [email protected].

As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors.