Rebeccah Graham |
King County Superior CourtPosition 22
Public Disclosure Commission
|
Cash*: | $37,171.00 | In-Kind: | $0.00 | Expenditures: | $32,997.58 | Ind For: | $0.00 | Ind Against: | $0.00 |
Anonymous: | $0.00 | Personal Funds: | $15,600.00 | Loans: | $9,400.00 | Misc: | $0.00 | Small Contr: | $81.00 |
Vendor | Date | Amount | Description |
PUBLISHERS MAILING SERVICE | 7/28/2008 | 14330.3 | MALING & POSTAGE |
OVERNIGHT PRINTING | 7/28/2008 | 7209.41 | PRINTING & POSTAGE |
ARGO STRATEGIES | 5/22/2008 | 3353.12 | TREASURY, WEBSITE, LETTERHEAD, REMITS, ENV (CAP CITY PRESS) |
GRAHAM REBECCAH J | 7/28/2008 | 2947 | REIMBURSEMENT- PATRIOT SIGNAGE-SIGNS |
LABELS & LISTS, INC | 7/28/2008 | 1201.74 | DATA |
LABELS & LISTS, INC | 8/7/2008 | 1201.74 | DATA |
GRAHAM REBECCAH J | 8/7/2008 | 725 | REIMBURSE- SUSAN PICATTI DESIGN (MAIL PIECE DESIGN) |
ARGO STRATEGIES | 7/28/2008 | 508.72 | 2ND RUN OF REMITS (CAP CITY PRESS) |
ARGO STRATEGIES | 7/28/2008 | 300 | TREASURY JUNE |
ARGO STRATEGIES | 7/28/2008 | 253.5 | DESIGN OF SLIM JIM (BIG PICTURE DESIGN) |
ARGO STRATEGIES | 7/28/2008 | 250 | TREASURY - MAY |
ARGO STRATEGIES | 7/28/2008 | 170 | PAGEMATCH |
LABELS & LISTS, INC | 7/28/2008 | 110 | TRACKER SOFTWARE |
COMPLETE CAMPAIGNS | 6/5/2008 | 75 | DATABASE FEE |
COMPLETE CAMPAIGNS | 7/7/2008 | 75 | DATABASE FEE |
COMPLETE CAMPAIGNS | 8/7/2008 | 75 | DATABSE FEE |
EXPENSES OF $50 OR LESS | 6/1/2008 | 75 | |
EVANGELINE CAFE | 7/29/2008 | 61.05 | CAMPAIGN HELP |
EXPENSES OF $50 OR LESS | 5/1/2008 | 58.5 | |
EXPENSES OF $50 OR LESS | 7/29/2008 | 17.5 | |
EXPENSES OF $50 OR LESS | 4/1/2008 | 0 |
VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA
98383 As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors. |