|
Suzanne Parisien |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
King County Superior CourtPosition One
CANDIDATE STATEMENT: "Suzanne’s passion for the law and her compassion for public service ... make her, in my mind, a fine candidate for ... the Superior Court bench." – Attorney General Rob McKenna "Her trial results were outstanding, and her ... clients have consistently expressed their confidence in her and the high quality of her work." – Governor Chris Gregoire In Superior Court, civil cases out-number criminal nearly 4 to 1. Assistant Attorney General Sue Parisien has two decades of civil trial experience and has mediated and arbitrated hundreds of cases on behalf of individuals, small businesses, corporations and the State of Washington. No other candidate has this breadth of experience. An award-winning volunteer and advocate for the vulnerable, Sue provides free legal representation to victims of domestic violence and has worked to ensure low-income citizens have equal access to justice. A breast cancer survivor, Sue volunteers for a non-profit organization dedicated to prevention and early detection. Sue Parisien has the commitment to justice and passion for fairness we need in the Superior Court. Rated: "Exceptionally Well Qualified" and "Well Qualified" Endorsers (partial list): Governor Booth Gardner, Rob McKenna, Bellevue Mayor Grant Degginger; State Senator Margarita Prentice, State Representatives Judy Clibborn, Fred Jarrett, Zack Hudgins; King County Council Members Dow Constantine and Julia Patterson; former Secretaries of the Departments of Transportation, Corrections and DSHS; and leading attorneys Jenny Durkan, Kevin Hamilton, David McDonald. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official web site: www.sueforjudge.com | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opponents: Susan Amini and
Tim
Bradshaw |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Candidate ratings:
Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings for candidates with an asterisk (*), and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate. Again, please check the organizations' pages for further details. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Newspaper endorsements (click paper for details):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance report: (Click a dollar figure for detailed data from the
Public Disclosure Commission. Note that summary numbers here might not match
detailed data for various reasons.)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Media stories:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA
98383 As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors. |