Archived Version: September 19, 2006


An information resource for Washington voters

 

Home

Show My Elections

Voting for Judges: FAQ

Supreme Court

Court of Appeals

Ratings and Endorsements

Audio and Video

Media Stories

Campaign Finance

Who We Are

Comments

 

VotingforJudges.org » Ratings & Endorsements » Candidate Ratings »
 

Washington Women Lawyers

Ratings

 
 

Washington Women Lawyers rates candidates based on a candidate questionnaire, interviews of references, and in-person candidate interviews with the committee. Additional information about WWL's rating criteria is available here. WWL's ratings for additional positions and its full ratings policies and procedures can be found at www.wwl.org.

Please note: WWL's state judicial evaluations committee rates only those candidates who have sought a rating, so not all candidates have been evaluated.

Washington Women Lawyers has issued the following ratings of judicial candidates:

Candidate

Position Sought

Rating

Rating Expiration Date

Susan Owens

WA State Supreme Court

Exceptionally Well Qualified

July 2008

Gerry Alexander

WA State Supreme Court

Exceptionally Well Qualified

August 2008

Marlin Appelwick

WA State Court of Appeals, Div I

Exceptionally Well Qualified

September 2008

Mary Kay Becker

WA State Court of Appeals, Div I

Exceptionally Well Qualified

August 2008

Ronald Cox

WA State Court of Appeals, Div I

Exceptionally Well Qualified

August 2008

Joel Penoyar

WA State Court of Appeals, Div II

Exceptionally Well Qualified

August 2008

Christine Quinn-Brintnall

WA State Court of Appeals, Div II

Well Qualified

September 2008

See also: WWL's web site.


 
 

VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA  98383
Email your comments or fill out our form.

Votingforjudges.org includes ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors.