SEAMEC

Ratings and Endorsements

The overall rating is determined by the Steering Committee based on all information available to SEAMEC, including interviews, a written candidate questionnaire, SEAMEC history database and files, public records, and community input. The Steering Committee assigns a rating of 0 to 5 which takes into account not only the candidate’s verbal support of LGBT issues but his or her actions and public history of support for or hostility to the LGBT community. A candidate who is assigned a Fairness Rating of 3 is said to "Meet Expectations." From there the ratings increase or decrease based on the candidate’s demonstrated support or resistance to the LGBT community.

The following is an overview of each Fairness Rating level. It is not intended to define each level but to provide general guidance.

5 – Demonstrates Leadership: A candidate who is rated a 5 has taken a leadership role in advancing the rights of the LGBT community and promoting equality. The candidate has championed and taken an active leadership role in advancing one or more LGBT causes. A level 5 candidate can be expected to continue to reliably champion LGBT causes.
4 – Exceeds Expectations: A candidate who is rated a 4 has actively and consistently supported the LGBT community in myriad ways. The candidate has supported the advancement of LGBT issues, causes, or legislation and has a documented history of support which may also include participation in a number of LGBT events, issue endorsement, and/or financial support of more than one LGBT organization. A level 4 candidate can be expected to continue to actively and reliably support LGBT causes.
3 – Meets Expectations: A candidate who is rated a 3 has expressed or demonstrated a commitment to LGBT causes and the LGBT community but is lacking a consistent or documented history of support. A level 3 candidate can be expected to actively and reliably support LGBT causes.
2 – Needs Improvement: A candidate who is rated a 2 has expressed support for one or more LGBT causes but cannot provide a commitment to the LGBT community, usually due to a lack of knowledge or understanding of LGBT issues. A level 2 candidate may be expected to support some LGBT causes but cannot be considered a reliable or consistent supporter.
1 – Resistant: A candidate who is rated a 1, in general, has passively supported anti-LGBT issues, causes, or legislation or has expressed general opposition to LGBT equality. A level 1 candidate cannot be expected to support any LGBT causes.
0 – Hostile: A candidate who is rated a 0 has demonstrated a commitment to actively support anti-LGBT causes or to inhibit progress toward LGBT equality. A level 0 candidate can be expected to actively fight most or all LGBT causes.

Judicial Candidates

State Supreme Court

See also: SEAMEC 2006 Primary Fairness Ratings

VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA  98383
Write to [email protected] or fill out our form.

Votingforjudges.org includes ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors.