The
King County Bar Association Judicial screening process utilizes a
representative body of the King County Bar Association in its 70-member
judicial screening committee. The committee undertakes a fair and
comprehensive rating process designed to create a high quality bench and
assist the public by providing them with important information on
judicial candidates. The King County Bar Association invites judicial
candidates for contested judicial elections to participate in this
thorough, three-part screening process.
The criteria for rating candidates are uniform and
objective and have been used substantially in the same form for the past
twenty-five years. These criteria measure an individual’s suitability to
serve in a judicial position. When applying the rating criteria, the
screening committee evaluates each candidate against the same criteria.
There is no ranking of candidates or comparison of one candidate against
another.
The criteria are as follows:
-
Maturity, integrity, courtesy, intellectual honesty,
fairness, good judgment, curiosity, and common sense;
-
A demonstrated commitment to equal justice under the
law, and fairness and open-mindedness with sensitivity to and
respect for all persons, regardless of race, color, sex, sexual
orientation, national origin, ancestry, religion, political
ideology, creed, age, marital status, or physical or mental
handicap, disability, or impairment. This commitment and sensitivity
can be evidenced by the individual’s involvement in community
affairs and activities, professional practice, and personal and
professional background.
-
The courage and ability to make difficult decisions
under stress.
-
The competence, ability and experience (which may
include trial experience) to manage pretrial and trial proceedings,
including administrative proceedings, arbitration, settlement
conferences, and commissioner or magistrate responsibilities. It
should include an ability to address diverse issues, weigh
conflicting testimony, apply the law to the facts, understand the
dynamics of the trial or conflict resolution process, and command
respect from attorneys, litigants, and other participants in the
process.
-
The ability to work with a wide variety of subject
matter.
-
Excellent legal ability and confidence, and
demonstrated excellence in legal work and practice.
-
The energy and capacity for hard work.
-
The potential for ongoing professional development
and demonstrated leadership in the profession.
-
The ability to communicate clearly and effectively,
orally and in writing, with attorneys, litigants, witnesses, and
jurors.
-
Interest and commitment to working with other judges
and court administrators to improve the administration of justice.
WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT
– POSITION 2
KING COUNTY DISTRICT COURT
NORTHEAST DISTRICT, POSITION 2
CANDIDATE |
KCBA
RATING |
FRANK V. LASALATA
Click to view questionnaire |
Well Qualified |
RICHARD POPE |
Not Qualified
The KCBA Board of Trustees has become aware
of court orders imposing or referencing sanctions against
Richard Pope and one referral to the Washington State Bar
Association for unprofessional conduct which the Board believes
may bear on his fitness to be a judge. |
See also: KCBA's
Judicial Ratings Page.
|
|
|
VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA
98383
Write to
[email protected] or fill out our form.
Votingforjudges.org includes ratings and endorsements from
numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be
better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates;
the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the
views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors.
|
|