Archived Version: August 17, 2010


An information resource for Washington voters


 

Home

Show My Elections

Supreme Court

Court of Appeals

Ratings and Endorsements

Media Stories

Candidates A-Z

Judges A-Z

Voting for Judges: FAQ

Sponsors

Election Archives

Support VotingforJudges

 

Harvey Dunham

 

Washington Court of Appeals

Division III, District One

This contest will be decided in the Primary.

Harvey Dunham

Legal/Judicial Experience: I have practiced law for over 30 years. I was a Pro-Tem Judge for over seven years, I was a District Court Judge in Spokane County for approximately two years.

Other Professional Experience: I served in the US Army and Army Reserve for 24 years.

Education: B.A. Washington State University, J.D. In Law at Texas Tech University.

Community Service: Past member of the Spokane Jaycee's and past member East Spokane Kiwanis Club.

Statement: I believe in old-fashioned justice. I believe that a judge should not make new law. I believe that the legislative branch should make new law. I believe a judge should follow the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Washington and not ignore them. I believe in the right of the people to keep and bear arms. I believe in the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. I believe that no person should be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb. I believe that private property should not be taken for public use without just compensation. I believe that in all criminal prosecutions, the accused should enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial.

My qualifications: Graduate WSU, 24 years U.S. Army and Army Reserve, 30 years of law practice in Texas, Arizona and Washington, many years a Pro-Tem Judge, District Court Judge in Spokane County for approx. two years, member American Legion. My Wife and I operate an Adult Family Home for six developmentally delayed adults in our home.


 
Official web site: www.votedunham.com | Facebook  
Opponent: Laurel Siddoway
 

Newspaper endorsements (click paper for details):

NEWSPAPER HARVEY
DUNHAM
LAUREL
SIDDOWAY
Spokane Spokesman-Review  

 
Candidate ratings:

ORGANIZATION HARVEY
DUNHAM
LAUREL
SIDDOWAY
Joint Asian
Judicial Evaluations Committee
* Exceptionally
Well Qualified
Latina/o Bar Association of Washington * Exceptionally
Well Qualified
QLaw: The GLBT Bar
Association of Washington
* Exceptionally
Well Qualified
Washington Women Lawyers * Exceptionally
Well Qualified
Washington Association
of County Prosecutors
* Well Qualified

Important note! Each of these organizations uses its own standards and rating terms when evaluating candidates; please check their pages for further information. We do not have ratings for candidates with an asterisk (*), and the reasons vary. Some evaluations may still be in process, or we might not have received them yet; some candidates may not have been offered an opportunity to participate, or they may have declined to participate. Again, please check the organizations' pages for further details.


 
   
Finance report:

(Click a dollar figure for detailed information.)

CANDIDATE REPORT DATE CONTRIBUTIONS EXPENDITURES
Harvey Dunham 8/17/2010 $5,875.00
Loans $2,000.00
$4,731.06
Laurel Siddoway 8/17/2010 $39,649.41
Personal Funds $3,700.00
Loans $3,000.00
$31,529.96

 
Media stories:
    August 6, 2010
Spokesman-Review   Two vie for seat on Washington Appeals Court
    July 28, 2010
Pacific Northwest Inlander   [Opinion] Separation anxiety
    March 25, 2010
Spokesman-Review   Siddoway chosen to fill Court of Appeals vacancy

 
   
 

VotingforJudges.org, P.O. Box 1460, Silverdale, WA  98383
Write to comments@votingforjudges.org.

As the election approaches, Votingforjudges.org will include ratings and endorsements from numerous organizations. We provide this information so that voters will be better informed about the candidates. We do not rate or endorse any candidates; the ratings and endorsements of organizations included at this site reflect the views of those individual organizations and not necessarily the views of votingforjudges.org or its sponsors.